Can anyone else say “rigged because of extreme bias?” Even if this wasn’t rigged, no one can deny the extreme bias on display here. Calling Pinkie “best pony” is more stale than year-old milk. I’m out!
@Kleytito
/mlp/ event where multiple female characters (barring previous winners) are nominated then anon’s vote for who their favorite is pageant style.
@Background Pony #9B2B
Except for the fact that the rigger didn’t care about them. He just wanted them the backgrond ponies to win to prove the point that the voting system was flawed and could be rigged by anyone willing, which he was
@Background Pony #8F33
If I understand the rules correctly, while the winner will never again be eligible, the other three of the four finalists will not be eligible the following year. Therefore, despite how unfairly those three you mentioned had lost, the fact that they failed to be among the four finalists as a result means they’ll still be eligible next year.
I call that karma against the rigger, because those who supposedly should have finished better this year will get to come back next year.
@Background Pony #9517
If you look closely at the votes every strong pick had like 50 votes against them. Cheerilee, Celestia and Fluttershy should have won their matches
Pinkie won by an extremely slim margin. She survived the rigging attempt.
The only “rigging” was from the Raven Inkwell spammer who itted to buying multiple Google s to disrupt the contest once his waifu got voted out, then he spammed the thread blaming Ponk voters.
Considering Pinkie won narrowly each time it’s clear the riggers tried knocking out the big players but failed each time with her.
She’s a previous winners, who are automatically disqualified.
I can’t find her