4th dimensional vore

Source
Report Share List favoriters

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ ~sub~

Detailed syntax guide

LemonDrop
Duckinator - Same nonsensical quacks in every pond
Fifth Yacht -
Grass - ...has been touched
Diamond Trophy - Are you a TAS by any chance?
Nightmare in the Moon - Had their OC in the 2024 Derpibooru Collab.
Pixel Perfection - I still call her Lightning Bolt
Lunar Guardian - Earned a place among the ranks of the most loyal New Lunar Republic soldiers (April Fools 2023).
Crystal Roseluck - Had their OC in the 2023 Derpibooru Collab.
Elements of Harmony - Had an OC in the 2022 Community Collab
Non-Fungible Trixie -

C++ Crazed
@Background Pony #0AA9
Ye was gonna comment this. A hypercube is made of 8 cubes as its 3 dimensional faces and really this is just how it looks when projected to 3D at one paticular angle. If you were to rotate it on a particular axis the “inner cube” there will become the outer one since neither is really inside the other.
Background Pony #0AA9
*sigh* If this is a 4-dimensional tesseract, the “smaller” cube (it is the same size) is not inside the other one, but next to it in the “4th dimension” (the one that’s depicted with perspective), therefore, it’s not vore.
I am so upset about it, that I’ll repost this comment to other boorus.