@Background Pony #6018
No, it doesn’t work like that, and please do not do that as it would confuse the s.
There’s a well settled modus operandi, changing that would be conterproductive.
The larger image should be reported, so that it can be merged into the smaller image, thereby replacing it. Reporting the smaller image would imply that it should replace the larger one, which would generally be counterproductive.
From the duplicate report form (assuming that that’s what you mean):
>Target ID number ____
>This is the ID number you think this image should be merged into.
>For instance, if you think image 1 is a dupe of image 0, you would go to image 1 and enter 0 in this box.
Are the s not cable of speaking for themselves, or changing the instructions if they don’t want people to follow them?
No, it doesn’t work like that, and please do not do that as it would confuse the s.
There’s a well settled modus operandi, changing that would be conterproductive.
The larger image should be reported, so that it can be merged into the smaller image, thereby replacing it. Reporting the smaller image would imply that it should replace the larger one, which would generally be counterproductive.
Why necroposting and actually saying what I said myself?
From the duplicate report form (assuming that that’s what you mean):
>Target ID number ____
>This is the ID number you think this image should be merged into.
>For instance, if you think image 1 is a dupe of image 0, you would go to image 1 and enter 0 in this box.
…and had a three way with that tiny pony.
Naughty!