@Sky_Wolf
What if she’s only this strong as Pinkamena? There’s a scary thought.
But I think it’s more a practice thing. Or rather, having built that natural strength up. This is a Pinkie who’s a warrior and so has become stronger than the main Pinkie, though the main Pinks is actually pretty strong herself, we’ve seen. Meanwhile, war gets Maud off the farm and so she’s less strong (this is impressive, but the main Maud turned a boulder that size into powder, singlehoofedly, ?)
@angrybrony
Sure, can be. But we also saw that she worked for some time on the rock farm, so in all fairness she could have learned it, or at least the basic from of it, as a filly. No one really knows and I don’t care either way =)
@Keith Mowz
She never had a reason or correct position to do it? If I correctly, she was incapacitated during that one time Maud saved her. Maybe if she was free and mobile, she would have bashed the rock herself? Maybe it is something ed during birth in their family? No one really knows =)
I thought we don’t really know for sure that she can’t do it even in the canon timeline… Am I missing something? I don’t re-watch episodes so I might have forgotten some details :/
Pinkie Pie could’ve had ridiculous super strength with the capacity to shred through rocks like that if she stayed on the farm. Instead, she sacrificed it for being a party pony and being so random.
@Princess♥Cadance
I would prefer such drama to not exist in the first place but sure, I will try not to respond to personal jabs as long as they withhold from dragging this on for no real reason =P
Also, that one line STILL doesn’t justify you two dragging personal past deeds and bad blood into this thread. There really was and still is no cause to do that… This thread is toxic enough without personal offences :\
@Keith Mowz
But… but… Smiley face! Smiley face means a heartfelt joke or being playful, not a troll bait or… never mind >_>
I never meant it as a challenge for the sake of challenge or being a duck, but I see what you mean, people just tend to assume the worst.
I liked that someone started discussing the thing in of scientific rules and that last comment was me indicating that I’m genuinely interested to see if the person can justify his point of view or disprove mine. If he somehow suggested a working set of IRL laws that allows for these tricks, I would have gladly accepted it and changed my canon. Alas, I think I phrased it incorrectly… as usual.
@Blissey1
You keep mentioning this badge over and over again like it’s supposed to really mean something. From what I saw on this site, badges are extremely erratic and mods just give them whenever they feel like it. I have no idea why or who gave me the mystery badge, and I received the duck one in an argument with a who abuses site functionality via multiple s and impersonating up to 4 people at the same time to complain about fatal images (just like I did several years ago on non-fatal images). The difference is he does it for years and doesn’t plan to stop or change… Guess what? He still didn’t get ANY badges even despite having over 3 months of ban time on each of his s and all mods knowing him in the face.
So… duck badge means anything? I don’t think so. Now please stop mentioning it, you just look silly.
@Blissey1
Maybe I’ve been playing/watching too much Undertale stuff lately, but I’ve been feeling optimistic that people can be better than I should probably expect them to be.
@Sky_Wolf
You complained about the show’s quality; telling people who still like the show that it sucks is always going to provoke them when they’ve had people complaining about how it’s ruined for the majority of the show’s existance.
Your complaint was baffling to most people since you seem to be complaining that this cartoon used a cartoon trope, despite it being justified in-universe by established magical canon (presuming that animation tropes even need to be justified). Then, you ended your next post with
So yeah, try again :D
at which point it devolved into an argument. ‘come at me bro’ tends to do that.
@Blissey1
Like look at the last several messages in here. You blame me, but what wrong did I do? Say that this image is unrealistic and that I don’t like it? Saying that I have my own headcanons, just like all of us do?
And look at what we currently have - a detailed thread with people who have past grudges on me reducing a normal conversation to spiteful personal accusations that have nothing to do with the picture itself. Both of you are openly attacking me basing your statements on nothing but your personal experiences from the past (ones that have literally nothing to do with this situation) and somehow trying to present me as the wrong party in this situation. Is this normal behavior? Who is being the duck here?
@Blissey1
I think you misinterpret my intentions and how such things tend to happen. Usually it goes like this:
I see a topic I care about and want to state my opinion just because that’s what Internet is for and because I might find people with similar opinions and befriend them.
People read the post/opinion and the most vocal s, usually the ones who met and disliked me on other pictures in the past (like you or Keith, both of whom know and still blame me for my behavior on ||vore pictures || in the distant past), start saying that my opinion is shit and I’m not allowed to have it because a number of reasons, some of which are personal like me supposedly being a duck and one or more of others about how superior their interpretation is compared to mine.
I go into defensive mode and state why my opinion has right to exist, or I disprove their accusations, or I state why their opinion is even worse or at least no better than mine. I then politely ask to stop and keep it at that as we are unlikely to reach an agreement and there is nothing wrong with having differing likes, as no version is perfect and it is up to us which one to chose.
Other s ignore my request and start a shitthrowing session by posting even more ridiculous accusations or other nonsense.
So, the question is who is to blame for drama you seem to attribute to me? s who just want to state their opinion for the sake of providing different view points and learning about the topic, or people who get butthurt and aggressive at others for having different opinions and wanting not just state theirs and be done with it, but to actively disprove views of other people and bait them into a pointless argument?
The only thing you can truly accuse me of is for being ionate and not knowing how to quit a meaningless and sometimes even aggressive argument in time. Well, that and not being able to write concisely or more emotionally-accurate due to not being a native speaker. But then again, are these two such a bad thing?
@Keith Mowz
Not all discussions can be won, especially if one doesn’t have any actual proof of his opinion beyond personal biased interpretations and the famous “being popular makes it right” excuse.
What if she’s only this strong as Pinkamena? There’s a scary thought.
But I think it’s more a practice thing. Or rather, having built that natural strength up. This is a Pinkie who’s a warrior and so has become stronger than the main Pinkie, though the main Pinks is actually pretty strong herself, we’ve seen. Meanwhile, war gets Maud off the farm and so she’s less strong (this is impressive, but the main Maud turned a boulder that size into powder, singlehoofedly, ?)
Sure, can be. But we also saw that she worked for some time on the rock farm, so in all fairness she could have learned it, or at least the basic from of it, as a filly. No one really knows and I don’t care either way =)
it’s probly something she’d have to learn
She never had a reason or correct position to do it? If I correctly, she was incapacitated during that one time Maud saved her. Maybe if she was free and mobile, she would have bashed the rock herself? Maybe it is something ed during birth in their family? No one really knows =)
Theoretically? But she’s never done so, outside of this one instance.
But she would be depressed. And party pony pinkie has all that reality warping fourth wall power stuff going on.
Hey, whatever makes her happy, right?
Pinkie Pie could’ve had ridiculous super strength with the capacity to shred through rocks like that if she stayed on the farm. Instead, she sacrificed it for being a party pony and being so random.
I would prefer such drama to not exist in the first place but sure, I will try not to respond to personal jabs as long as they withhold from dragging this on for no real reason =P
Please stop caring. Take your drama to the forums or preferably somewhere else.
But… but… Smiley face! Smiley face means a heartfelt joke or being playful, not a troll bait or… never mind >_>
I never meant it as a challenge for the sake of challenge or being a duck, but I see what you mean, people just tend to assume the worst.
I liked that someone started discussing the thing in of scientific rules and that last comment was me indicating that I’m genuinely interested to see if the person can justify his point of view or disprove mine. If he somehow suggested a working set of IRL laws that allows for these tricks, I would have gladly accepted it and changed my canon. Alas, I think I phrased it incorrectly… as usual.
@Blissey1
You keep mentioning this badge over and over again like it’s supposed to really mean something. From what I saw on this site, badges are extremely erratic and mods just give them whenever they feel like it. I have no idea why or who gave me the mystery badge, and I received the duck one in an argument with a who abuses site functionality via multiple s and impersonating up to 4 people at the same time to complain about fatal images (just like I did several years ago on non-fatal images). The difference is he does it for years and doesn’t plan to stop or change… Guess what? He still didn’t get ANY badges even despite having over 3 months of ban time on each of his s and all mods knowing him in the face.
So… duck badge means anything? I don’t think so. Now please stop mentioning it, you just look silly.
Maybe I’ve been playing/watching too much Undertale stuff lately, but I’ve been feeling optimistic that people can be better than I should probably expect them to be.
don’t even bother, he’s just a troll, and now finally has the badge to prove it.
You complained about the show’s quality; telling people who still like the show that it sucks is always going to provoke them when they’ve had people complaining about how it’s ruined for the majority of the show’s existance.
Your complaint was baffling to most people since you seem to be complaining that this cartoon used a cartoon trope, despite it being justified in-universe by established magical canon (presuming that animation tropes even need to be justified). Then, you ended your next post with
Like look at the last several messages in here. You blame me, but what wrong did I do? Say that this image is unrealistic and that I don’t like it? Saying that I have my own headcanons, just like all of us do?
And look at what we currently have - a detailed thread with people who have past grudges on me reducing a normal conversation to spiteful personal accusations that have nothing to do with the picture itself. Both of you are openly attacking me basing your statements on nothing but your personal experiences from the past (ones that have literally nothing to do with this situation) and somehow trying to present me as the wrong party in this situation. Is this normal behavior? Who is being the duck here?
You know, dramas are one of the main reasons I like this fandom. And I legitimately, unironically say it.
I think you misinterpret my intentions and how such things tend to happen. Usually it goes like this:
So, the question is who is to blame for drama you seem to attribute to me? s who just want to state their opinion for the sake of providing different view points and learning about the topic, or people who get butthurt and aggressive at others for having different opinions and wanting not just state theirs and be done with it, but to actively disprove views of other people and bait them into a pointless argument?
The only thing you can truly accuse me of is for being ionate and not knowing how to quit a meaningless and sometimes even aggressive argument in time. Well, that and not being able to write concisely or more emotionally-accurate due to not being a native speaker. But then again, are these two such a bad thing?
sure as hell doesn’t stop you from trying