Your answer is certainly the correct number and that would be the correct conclusion of the problem “determine the quotient.” Then 51.5 or 51 and a half would be good answers with Masem’s numbering, or 21.2 with mine. However, context in presenting information is important. Here, the problem is “identify digits,” so saying “51 with remainder 1” is probably more applicable.
IF I COULD UPVOTE I WOULD
the mane 6 can never be divided
Your answer is certainly the correct number and that would be the correct conclusion of the problem “determine the quotient.” Then 51.5 or 51 and a half would be good answers with Masem’s numbering, or 21.2 with mine. However, context in presenting information is important. Here, the problem is “identify digits,” so saying “51 with remainder 1” is probably more applicable.
51 1/2. (Rewrite the remainder as a fraction.)
Edited
So there are two possible answers then. You could also have RD = 5 and FS = 2, with Twi = 6.
Honestly it bothers the hell out of me that Fluttershy isn’t right-justified over the 10s digit of the dividend.
Edited
Not sure. I might just be wrong on the rules. I am half asleep right now. This equation just feels unfinished though.
Edited
Is it possible to solve without a remainder?
Yeah… I think. Hmm, this may take a bit more work.
Edited
Wow! 9 minutes!
Edited
RD= 2
TW=3
FS= 5
103 / 2 = 51 remainder 1