@Delphince
Wallflower erased memories. Plz check your facts or at least the special beforehand.
Well, let’s see… Neurological engrams, specifically episodic declarative memory in the form of electrochemical impulses maintained by synaptic protein synthesis and membrain potentials typically between the –40 mV to –80 mV range, resultant of intracellular transduction cascades, were transformed into a cohesive matrix of unknown energy type emitting photonic radiation in a single binding color and repeating complex pictograph both representative of the subject matter with the former being metaphorical and the latter literal. While this transformation is left implied, considering the former host of said memories immediately displays symptoms of acute dissociative amnesia, it can be reasonably concluded that a comparable process has taken place. There are no known naturally occurring biological processes that can facilitate said transformation, despite originating from the target’s host body, therefore it can be deduced that the phenomenon can be attributed to action by the directed annular projection of energy emitted by an object previously categorized as “magical” in nature which struck the host prior to the event under consideration. Due to the physical discomfort exhibited by the host and accompanying vocalizations, the emission of the energy matrix can be categorized as “nonconsensual”. Regarding the methods by which the matrix maintains its cohesion, orthodox shape, and intricately complex superficial appearance, as well as locomotion, again: no natural occurrence can be attributed to such a construct and it can be assumed no hidden technological processes were working in concert with the aforementioned magical artifact, therefore it can be stated with acceptably high confidence that the nature of the energy matrix is, as well, “magical”. This matrix is then drawn to and absorbed by the artifact. Destruction of the artifact results in the reverse of the entire process, releasing all recently absorbed and evidently “stored” independent matrixes before they are reintegrated with their original corresponding hosts.
In conclusion, memories were converted into a magical energy, removed from their owner without consent in a non-destructive manner—i.e., “stolen”—as a result of the application of a magical artifact by a second party. While summary destruction of said memories were indicated as a potential, such destruction or erasure did not occur during this specific event as the conditions for such erasure were not met.
@northern haste
1st movie: Crown - Stealing a magical thing to get the magic in the thing. that’s not using a thing to steal magic
2nd movie: Siren gems - Stealing magical emotions for more magic with a thing. that feels more like getting energy than magic
3rd movie: Sci-Twi’s McGuffin - Stealing magic with a thing.
4th movie: Rocks - Ill-begotten magic infused into a thing. that’s not using a thing to steal magic
Mirror Magic: Mirror - Stealing magical girls with a thing.
5th movie: Rock - Stealing magical memories with a thing. that’s not using a thing to steal magic also they’re not magical memories
@northern haste
1st movie: Crown - Stealing a magical thing to get the magic in the thing.
2nd movie: Siren gems - Stealing magical emotions for more magic with a thing.
3rd movie: Sci-Twi’s McGuffin - Stealing magic with a thing.
4th movie: Rocks - Ill-begotten magic infused into a thing.
Mirror Magic: Mirror - Stealing magical girls with a thing.
5th movie: Rock - Stealing magical memories with a thing.
But hey! Kudos on finally making a movie where the antagonist[s] doesn’t turn into a monster[s]. …And an extended pony section (though the budget restrictions were still apparent even there), and establishing Clover’s gender.
@Background Pony #E00D Thanks. Although I might be rejected because of my darker ideas. Some of which were inspired by the Martin Scorsese film called “Silence” I’m basically the ONLY SU fan, AND the only brony that has seen the film in full, and knows all the details of the events.
Magic!
…wow.
Well, let’s see… Neurological engrams, specifically episodic declarative memory in the form of electrochemical impulses maintained by synaptic protein synthesis and membrain potentials typically between the –40 mV to –80 mV range, resultant of intracellular transduction cascades, were transformed into a cohesive matrix of unknown energy type emitting photonic radiation in a single binding color and repeating complex pictograph both representative of the subject matter with the former being metaphorical and the latter literal. While this transformation is left implied, considering the former host of said memories immediately displays symptoms of acute dissociative amnesia, it can be reasonably concluded that a comparable process has taken place. There are no known naturally occurring biological processes that can facilitate said transformation, despite originating from the target’s host body, therefore it can be deduced that the phenomenon can be attributed to action by the directed annular projection of energy emitted by an object previously categorized as “magical” in nature which struck the host prior to the event under consideration. Due to the physical discomfort exhibited by the host and accompanying vocalizations, the emission of the energy matrix can be categorized as “nonconsensual”. Regarding the methods by which the matrix maintains its cohesion, orthodox shape, and intricately complex superficial appearance, as well as locomotion, again: no natural occurrence can be attributed to such a construct and it can be assumed no hidden technological processes were working in concert with the aforementioned magical artifact, therefore it can be stated with acceptably high confidence that the nature of the energy matrix is, as well, “magical”. This matrix is then drawn to and absorbed by the artifact. Destruction of the artifact results in the reverse of the entire process, releasing all recently absorbed and evidently “stored” independent matrixes before they are reintegrated with their original corresponding hosts.
In conclusion, memories were converted into a magical energy, removed from their owner without consent in a non-destructive manner—i.e., “stolen”—as a result of the application of a magical artifact by a second party. While summary destruction of said memories were indicated as a potential, such destruction or erasure did not occur during this specific event as the conditions for such erasure were not met.
Edited
That sounds less like a contradiction and more like a disagreement.
Edited
1st movie: Crown - Stealing a magical thing to get the magic in the thing.
2nd movie: Siren gems - Stealing magical emotions for more magic with a thing.
3rd movie: Sci-Twi’s McGuffin - Stealing magic with a thing.
4th movie: Rocks - Ill-begotten magic infused into a thing.
Mirror Magic: Mirror - Stealing magical girls with a thing.
5th movie: Rock - Stealing magical memories with a thing.
But hey! Kudos on finally making a movie where the antagonist[s] doesn’t turn into a monster[s]. …And an extended pony section (though the budget restrictions were still apparent even there), and establishing Clover’s gender.
If you want it SOOO badly, assign a job and work with the writing staff, not ranting in the Internet. :P
Enough with the conspiracy theories, and wanting Hasbro listen to the “fans” (your fanfics to be canon)
Don’t forget the time limit the memory stone has…if it’s not restored within three days, they’ll be erased forever.
Edited
Wallflower erased memories. Plz check your facts or at least the special beforehand.
The question is… would those be enough for the medium sized plushie?
She’s not stealing magic.
And I only recall friendship games involving magic stealing with a thing
Nope, did you watch Dance Magic and Movie Magic? :P
“knock-offs”
Sunset Shimmer, your claim is invalid.