I’m thinking it’s the product of a random walk on a Markov chain model built from one or more actual essays. There’s a few tells; just trying to decide if it uses n-grams of more than one successive word for the nodes.
Yeah, I read about halfway through before I decided conclusively that it was computer generated, and not just a bad writer who was overreliant on buzzwords. The complete and utter lack of an actual point even being attempted was what finally decided it for me; even the worst communicator usually has a general drift towards a concept when writing.
@Background Pony Number 17
It’s a parody. A really bad one. I know it was probably done on purpose, but making your sentence structure flat out unreadable doesn’t make something funny.
Okay. I had no idea what I was reading.
its a 6 month old parody of TRS. If you are not familiar with TRS you are better off that way
Saw it in another image thread.
It’s from this video.
Where’d you get that image from?
It’s a fake, not TRS.
Deal with it.
Yeah, I read about halfway through before I decided conclusively that it was computer generated, and not just a bad writer who was overreliant on buzzwords. The complete and utter lack of an actual point even being attempted was what finally decided it for me; even the worst communicator usually has a general drift towards a concept when writing.
That’s because it’s actually a computer-generated “article” that was created using extensive samples of pre-existing TRS editorials.
It’s a parody. A really bad one. I know it was probably done on purpose, but making your sentence structure flat out unreadable doesn’t make something funny.