(Part 1) The 30 most prolific artists on Derpibooru by image ratings >>913513
(Part 2) The 30 most prolific artists on Derpibooru by image scores >>913544
Yeah… Twilight needs more futa pics to compete with Futashy… also I’m probably one of the many, many reasons why headcanons should never be taken seriously.
Unless it involves shipping Flash Sentry off to a part of the world where he’ll never return to the show.
I would like to know how Futashy became a thing. Like it can’t just be the AskFutashy blog that brought this number up to nearly double everyone else except Twilight
@Background Pony Number 17
If she’s a zoomorphic pony wearing a Scooby Doo collar and interacting with humanized versions of the other characters, you’d have to be clueless about Futashy not to know that’s Futashy, even if you only see her from the collar up.
@PonyPon
That raises the question of who decides what is Futashy and what is not. If the artist draws a picture of Fluttershy and says, “It’s really Futashy; I just hid the naughty bits,” should we as the viewer be expected to accept that interpretation?
Rene Magritte once drew a picture of a pipe with the caption, “This is not a pipe.” You could label every (safe) picture of Fluttershy “This is Futashy” and be just as authoritative.
Well, ive never been such a big fan of something until MLP, so you’re kinda right XD
Apparently you’ve never been on the NSFW side of any internet fandom before :P
characters who are futa who are drawn in non-sexual ways.
Seems like if we do it’s a 1%. I don’t know HOW you’d get futa that is SFW
Yeah… Twilight needs more futa pics to compete with Futashy… also I’m probably one of the many, many reasons why headcanons should never be taken seriously.
Unless it involves shipping Flash Sentry off to a part of the world where he’ll never return to the show.
Also, there is a disturbingly low amount of Trixie futa.
Ehhhh….
Times like this where Twilight being a secret Hermaphodite needs to be canon.
The obvious and liberally applied appeal to giving the demure one a powerful male attribute.
If she’s a zoomorphic pony wearing a Scooby Doo collar and interacting with humanized versions of the other characters, you’d have to be clueless about Futashy not to know that’s Futashy, even if you only see her from the collar up.
That raises the question of who decides what is Futashy and what is not. If the artist draws a picture of Fluttershy and says, “It’s really Futashy; I just hid the naughty bits,” should we as the viewer be expected to accept that interpretation?
Rene Magritte once drew a picture of a pipe with the caption, “This is not a pipe.” You could label every (safe) picture of Fluttershy “This is Futashy” and be just as authoritative.
When it’s a character for whom that is their most notable trait, or when the artist says so.
But no, it’s usually not very relevant to those pics.
And in that case how do you even know they’re futa, or how does that matter at all to the picture >_>
The pics where they’re futa, but don’t actually show the evidence of such.