(Part 1) The 30 most prolific artists on Derpibooru by image ratings >>913513
(Part 2) The 30 most prolific artists on Derpibooru by image scores >>XXXXXX
@iamli3
What the blazes are you blithering on about?! I’m not measuring time!! I’m talking about the percentage of the time, “the time” here being an abstract concept referring to Derpibooru’s image database as whole, i.e. “Twilight Sparkle is depicted as futa 1% of the time.”
@BrownieComicWriter
yeah , which would be the proper way to measure it’s occurrence , images don’t have time as one of their relative properties , they are either an object or not , and the way to measure objects is with counting , not time measurement…..
From this chart, we can see that Twilight is depicted as futanari almost exactly 1% of the time. I don’t see anything to do with ratios in there. I fthat were to be interpreted as a ratio, then it would be 1:99.
@FlutterLove
Well, that’s because futa images aren’t often tagged Futatwi (etc) by the er. Half the first page is going to be like that for any character.
@BrownieComicWriter
at the bare minimum Twilight should be higher
I just searched futa, twilight sparkle, -futatwi
and about half the first page was futa twilight
Left 4 Dead.
Say what??
I hate everything.
Me Francis.
Not merging them because this version has a smaller scale (of .2% instead of .5%).
&^£&$%&£$, I forgot about Maud.
…Needs a 100 hours to add all the tags tag.
Fluttershy is presumably because of the easy pun and Cartoonlion’s infamous use of it.
Chrysalis is likely because of shapeshfting.
Zecora is through… questionable alchemy. Trixie is equally questionable magic.
After that, I think the rate is low enough where justification is neither necessary or desired.
yeah k….
What the blazes are you blithering on about?! I’m not measuring time!! I’m talking about the percentage of the time, “the time” here being an abstract concept referring to Derpibooru’s image database as whole, i.e. “Twilight Sparkle is depicted as futa 1% of the time.”
yeah , which would be the proper way to measure it’s occurrence , images don’t have time as one of their relative properties , they are either an object or not , and the way to measure objects is with counting , not time measurement…..
That and, “(character), futa” will not turn up ONLY results where (character) is futa.
Example: “zecora, futa” turns up >>694430 , but the futa character in that image is not Zecora.
No…
From this chart, we can see that Twilight is depicted as futanari almost exactly 1% of the time. I don’t see anything to do with ratios in there. I fthat were to be interpreted as a ratio, then it would be 1:99.
Well, that’s because futa images aren’t often tagged Futatwi (etc) by the er. Half the first page is going to be like that for any character.
at the bare minimum Twilight should be higher
I just searched futa, twilight sparkle, -futatwi
and about half the first page was futa twilight