No. if we ever do it, it’ll be for things related to the person behind the . the closest thing to your proposal would be ‘cartuneslover-ish’,but, such a tag isn’t necessary.
@Blissey1
I don’t think people who tag it mean it in a negative way (not all of them anyway), it’s just sort of a signal that there are randomly mixed crossovers in the image, since all of her images are random crossovers.
Good point, shame there’s no “random crossover” tag though.
@Background Pony #42BC
No. if we ever do it, it’ll be for things related to the person behind the . the closest thing to your proposal would be ‘cartuneslover-ish’,but, such a tag isn’t necessary.
Edited
These don’t look negative to me.
your current filter.
your current filter.yeah, no, it is most assuredly meant in a negative way.
I don’t think people who tag it mean it in a negative way (not all of them anyway), it’s just sort of a signal that there are randomly mixed crossovers in the image, since all of her images are random crossovers.
they shouldn’t. tags calling out specific s or artists in a negative way are highly frowned upon
Not an Artist:Cartuneslover16 tag, just Cartuneslover16. People use that for images that look like hers, but aren’t drawn by her.
not really
Maybe these are some of the artist’s favorite characters, plus their OC?
if they’re even supposed to have anything in common, that is.