@GrumpyGriffGermán
They didn’t shove anything, it’s just a picture in of it. Not everything you disagree with is a forced message, you didn’t have to look at this image.
@Pagan
I for one don’t find this sort of thing worth attacking someone over. Artists: Draw what you want, and Viewers: Vote what you think, down or up.
Had it been up to me, this battle hadn’t have been fought. It wasn’t worth anything. All that happen was a garbage decision was put in place then very forcefully rejected. If anybody on either side gets “triggered” expect me to take a jab at them. Weaklings to words are no friends of mine.
“Sticks and stones may break bone, but words (or pictures in this case) will never hurt.”
@Feydrid Kearn
That may be the case but that still seems like a petty reason to attack the artist to me, it just doesn’t seem like something worthy of getting upset over, it’s not hurting anything or anyone and it’s not trying to offend anyone even if people were offended.
It reminds me of the downvote thing actually people said the downvote feature wasn’t trying to offend anyone even if people got offended by it (which is true) so it should stay and be left alone but then when the same thing applies to an image on the site suddenly that argument gets placed on the backburner. I think this just shows some people are too sensitive and for once it isn’t the people in of this sort of thing.
By that metric nearly every shipping image on the site should be tagged
mouthpiece.Refer to this
Don’t even think of trying to rules-lawyer your way around this.
PM me the link.
I put a link up to a post on 4chan which used that as the OP
Rule N has been around for ages though…
Rude enough to invent a new rule? Unlikely.
Probably something rude.
The fudge did this guy say?
They didn’t shove anything, it’s just a picture in of it. Not everything you disagree with is a forced message, you didn’t have to look at this image.
2.- Also shoving LGBT agenda? Really? Not cool artist, not cool.
It is cute.
That’s a good quality to have.
I for one don’t find this sort of thing worth attacking someone over. Artists: Draw what you want, and Viewers: Vote what you think, down or up.
Had it been up to me, this battle hadn’t have been fought. It wasn’t worth anything. All that happen was a garbage decision was put in place then very forcefully rejected. If anybody on either side gets “triggered” expect me to take a jab at them. Weaklings to words are no friends of mine.
“Sticks and stones may break bone, but words (or pictures in this case) will never hurt.”
That may be the case but that still seems like a petty reason to attack the artist to me, it just doesn’t seem like something worthy of getting upset over, it’s not hurting anything or anyone and it’s not trying to offend anyone even if people were offended.
It reminds me of the downvote thing actually people said the downvote feature wasn’t trying to offend anyone even if people got offended by it (which is true) so it should stay and be left alone but then when the same thing applies to an image on the site suddenly that argument gets placed on the backburner. I think this just shows some people are too sensitive and for once it isn’t the people in of this sort of thing.